SEBASTIAN RIVER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT

INDIAN RIVER COUNTY

Regular Board Meeting February 8, 2023
10:00 A.M.

Special District Services, Inc.
The Oaks Center 2501A Burns Road
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410

www.sridfl.org 561.630.4922 Telephone 877.SDS.4922 Toll Free 561.630.4923 Facsimile

AGENDA
SEBASTIAN RIVER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Indian River County Administration Complex Bldg. A, Room A1-102
1801 27th Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
REGULAR BOARD MEETING
February 8, 2023
10:00 a.m.

Call to Order
Proof of Publication…	Page 1
Establish Quorum
Additions or Deletions to Agenda
Approval of Minutes
December 14, 2022 Regular Board Meeting	Page 4
Old Business
Update on Indian River County – 66th Avenue Permit Application
Update on the CR 510 West Phase
Update on 82nd Avenue South Phase
New Business
Consider Ratification of R & S Metalworks Gate Retrofit Proposal to SJRWMD
Cost Share Program…	Page 8
Consider Approval of Indian River County Fire Station 7 Interlocal Agreement…	Page 42
Discussion Regarding Hawks Grove…	Page 45
Administrative Matters
Sand Mine Updates
Financial Update…	Page 55
Engineer Update
Manager Update
Board Members Comments
Comments from the Public for Items Not on the Agenda
Adjourn

0

· _·:·:•,•··•·..::···:··•·.··.·· ,:..c:.:,:1, +::,, .:,';<c• :,,C•,:·:;'e.;;;;.?A.RT.:0.Fl".HE·:U A.T.0DAY-.NE-TWO-RK
Indian River Press Journal
1801 U.S. 1, Vero Beach, FL 32960
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION

Attn:	Special District Services, Inc. SEBASTIAN RIVER IMPR OVEMENT DISTRIC 2501 BURNS RD# A

PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL 33410-5207
STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN

Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, said legal clerk, who on oath says that he/she is a legal clerk of the Indian River Press Journal, a daily newspaper published at Vero Beach in Indian River County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement was published in the  Indian River Press Journal in the following issues below. Affiant further says that the said Indian River Press Journal is a newspaper published in Vero Beach in said Indian River County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Indian River County, Florida, daily and distributed in Indian River County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid or promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. The Indian River Press Journal has been entered as Periodical Matter at the Post Offices in Vero Beach, Indian River County, Florida and has been for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement
lssue(s) dated before where the dales are noted or by publication on the newspaper's website, if authorized, on :
09/30/2022

Subscribed and sworn to before on September 30, 2022:

Nota St	a	
	/-7	
My commission expires

KATHLEEN AL EN
Notary Public State of Wisconsin

Publication Cost: $188.10 Ad No: 0005422153
Customer No: 1313368
PO#: FY 22/23 Mtg Schedule

# of Affidavits: 1	Page 1

SEBASTIAN RIVER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2022/2023 REGULAR BOARD MEETING SCHEDULE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that
the Sebastian River Improve­ ment District ("SRID") will hold Regular Board Meetings of the Board of Supervisors in the Offices of the Indian River County Administration Com­ plex, Bldg. A, Room A1-102, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 at 10:00 a.m. (**unless otherwise noted**) on the following dates:
October 12, 2022
November 9, 2022
December 14, 2022
January 11, 2023
February 8, 2023
March 8, 2023
April 12, 2023
May 10, 2023
**June 14, 2023**
July 12, 2023
August 9, 2023
September 13, 2023
**The June 14, 2023, Regular Board Meeting will be held Offices of the Indian River County Administration Com­ plex, Bldg. A, Room A1-102, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 and will com­ mence at 9:00 a.m. The Annu­ al Meeting will immediately follow the Regular Board Meeting at the same location.**
The purpose of the meetings is to conduct any business which may properly come be­ fore the Board. The meetings are open to the public and will be conducted in accord­ ance with the provisions of Florida law.	Copies of the Agenda for any of the meet­ ings may be obtained from the District's website or by contacting the District Manag­ er at (561) 630-4922 and/or toll free at 1-877-737-4922.
From time to time one Super­ visor may participate by tele­ phone; therefore, a speaker telephone may be present at the meeting location so the Supervisors may be fully in­ formed of the discussions tak­ ing place. Said meeting(s) may be continued as found necessary to a time and place specified on the record.
If any person decides to ap­ peal any decision made with respect to any matter consid­ ered at these meetings, such person will need a record of the proceedings and such per­ son may need to insure that a verbatim record of the pro­ ceedings is made at his or her own expense and which re­ cord includes the testimony and evidence on which the appeal is based.
In accordance with the provi­ sions of the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person re­ quiring special accommoda­ tions or an interpreter to par­ ticipate at any of these meet­ ings should contact the District Manager at (561) 630-
4922 and/or toll free at 1-877-
737-4922 at least seven (7) days prior to the date of the particular meeting.

Page 2

Meetings may be cancelled from time to time without ad-
\farl-ica nn+ir-o

SEBASTIAN RIVER IMPROVE­ MENT DISTRICT
https://sridfl.org/
Pub: Sept 30, 2022 TCN5422153

SEBASTIAN RIVER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT REGULAR BOARD MEETING MINUTES DECEMBER 14, 2022

Call to Order
The December 14, 2022, Regular Board Meeting of the Sebastian River Improvement District (the “District”) was called to order at 10:00 a.m. in the Indian River County Administration Complex, Building A, Room A-1-102, 1801 27th Street, Vero Beach, Florida 32960.

Proof of Publication
Proof of publication was presented showing that notice of the Regular Board Meeting had been published in Indian River Press Journal on September 30, 2022, as part of the District’s Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Meeting Schedule, as legally required.

Establish Quorum
A quorum was established with the following Supervisors present:

Board of Supervisors

Chairman	Jeff Bass	Present	
Supervisor	Tom Hammond	Present	
Supervisor	Chad Kelly	Present	

Staff members in attendance were:

District Manager	Todd Wodraska	Special District Services, Inc.	
District Counsel	Dan Harrell	Gonano & Harrell	
District Engineer	George Simons	Carter Associates, Inc.	
District Manager	Frank Sakuma	Special District Services, Inc.	

Additions or Deletions to Agenda
There were no additions or deletions to the agenda.

Approval of Minutes
September 14, 2022, Regular Board Meeting Minutes

A motion was made by Mr. Hammond, seconded by Mr. Kelly approving the minutes of the September 14, 2022, Regular Board Meeting. The motion approving the minutes passed unanimously.

OLD BUSINESS
Update on Indian River County – 66th Avenue Permit Application

Mr. Simons informed the Board the responses from the most recent Request for Additional Information (RAI) was pending from the County.
Update on 82nd Avenue Culvert Failure

Mr. Sakuma informed the Board the Landowners’ Agreement to and Acceptance and Acknowledgment of Waiver Conditions – Sebastian River Improvement District (Lateral Canal C Crossing) had been executed by Ms. Knight and received by the District. The permit application, fee, and as-builts were still pending.

Update on TH Farms – Affidavit of Exemption

Mr. Simons advised the Board the District had not yet received the permit application for this item.

Update on Proposed Fire Station

Mr. Harrell informed the Board that an interlocal agreement was under review and revision between the District and County for access over District right-of-way. A final draft will be presented during a future meeting for Board consideration.

Update on County Road 510 West Phase

Mr. Simons advised the Board of his discussions with FDOT staff on the next phase of CR 510. FDOT had assumed the 2” requirement was not applicable, however George noted the District was not inclined to issue further waivers of the rule. Further discussion and review is required.

Update on 82nd Avenue Southern Phase, Pre-App 10/17/2022

Mr. Simons notified the Board he had met with FDOT for a pre-application meeting related to the next phase of 82nd Avenue. Significant to their discussion was the FDOT possible request to discharge directly into Lateral C. Further information will be provided as available.

NEW BUSINESS

Consider Resolution No. 2022-06 – Adopting a Fiscal Year 2021/2022 Amended Budget

Resolution No. 2022-06 was presented, entitled:

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-06

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE SEBASTIAN RIVER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT AUTHORIZING AND ADOPTING AN AMENDED FINAL FISCAL YEAR 2021/2022 BUDGET (“AMENDED BUDGET”), PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 189, FLORIDA STATUTES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

Mr. Sakuma provided the Board with a synopsis of the final amended budget, as provided in the Board package and recommended approval of the resolution. There was a motion made by Mr. Bass, seconded by Mr. Hammond, adopting Resolution No. 2022-06, as presented. The motion carried unanimously.

Discussion about FDOT CR 510 Road Improvement Project

Mr. Simons led a Board discussion about the pending FDOT ROW offer that had been on hold due to the Corrigan litigation. Staff had transmitted the most recently available transfer documents to FDOT, which are being used by their office in drafting an offer. Further information would be provided to the Board once FDOT has modified the prior versions of the ROW purchase proposals.

Consider R&S Metalworks Gate Retrofit Proposal

Mr. Scott Snowden of R&S Metalworks presented the Board with his proposal for retrofitting a middle gate structure with a “top opening” structure, which would allow water from the top of the water column to flow, instead of from the bottom of the structure. After further discussion, Mr. Sakuma was directed to contact the SJRWMD about possibly submitting the proposal for consideration during their next cost share program.

Administrative Matters

Sand Mine Update
Mr. Simons noted the Wild Turkey and Blue Goose sand mine renewals were still under review.

Water Quality Report
Mr. Simons advised that the most recent water quality report was within acceptable levels.

Finance Report
Mr. Sakuma noted the finance report was included in the board package. Mr. Bass asked for SDS to see if the District could find more favorable bank rates in the current financial environment. Mr. Wodraska confirmed SDS was seeking better rates for all clients, including SRID, and would report back to the Board.

Board Member Comments (combined with Comments from the Public)

Mr. Hammond led a Board discussion on the very poor and dangerous section of 82nd Avenue, north of the Blue Goose Mine entrance. Despite the most recent repairs made by landowners with assistance from the County, the road continues to degrade. Mr. Richard Carnell and Mr. Ralph Brown, both representatives from Blue Goose, advised that the road was in such disrepair that the mine was seriously considering closing until the road could be made safe. After much discussion, the Board asked Mr. Sakuma to participate in a meeting to be facilitated by Mr. Hammond with County officials.

Comments from the Public for Items Not on the Agenda

Comments as noted under “Board Member Comments” above.

Adjournment

There being no further business to come before the Board, the Regular Board Meeting of the District was adjourned at 11:31 a.m. There were no objections.

 	
Secretary/Assistant Secretary	Chair/Vice-Chairman

R&S Metalworks & Co.

Sebastian River Improvement District To: Board of Supervisors

12/9//12

Re: Lateral C Structure - Center Gate Rehabilitation and Modification

R&S Metalworks recently did some structural repairs to all (3) radial gates at the SRID Lateral C water control. We replaced and repaired structural angles on all (3) three of the gates at this structure. The angles we replaced hold the gate in place against the upstream head water. These angles also enable the gate to pivot up and down. The new hot dip galvanized angles we installed replacing the old, corroded angles will last 20 plus years if maintained.
This structure has (2) 12ft wide gates on each side and (1) 20ft wide gate in the center.

Tilting Weir Gate Retrofit -

R&S Metalworks has designed a top water delivery system that can be retrofitted to an existing radial gate. This tilting weir gate system as shown in our illustration is fully adjustable in elevation.

We are providing an estimated cost to rehabilitate your (1) existing center gate and retrofit it with a tilting weir gate system to provide adjustable top water delivery.

Our scope of work and supply is as follows:

Disconnect and remove (1) gate with crane.
Transport (1) gate to be repaired.
Pressure wash, brush blast all corroded areas to be repaired.
Remove all the existing rubber seals.
Replace lower (3) horizontal channels.
Relace lower 48" of radius plate.
Replace all channel reinforcement gussets.
Replace all rubber seals.
Clean and prep the entire gate, brush blast all bare metal areas to be recoated with cold galvanize.
Re- coat the entire gate with heavy zinc cold galvanizing.

5690 Carlton Rd
Port St. Lucie, FL 34987

PHONE	(772) 466-3303
FAX	(772) 466-3333
EMAIL	SCOTT@RSMETALWORKS.COM

Tilting Weir Gate Retrofit-

The tilting weir gate would be retrofitted to the (1) 20 ft wide center gate only.

Fabricate and install new tilt gate system to the existing 20ft wide cent gate.
Install structural reinforcement to the existing gate.
Machine and fabricate tilt gate operator.

Installation-

Transport and reinstall the modified gates in place.
Install tilt gate operator system.
Perform all testing of the gates and seal system.

Estimated turnkey cost for the modification of the (1) existing center gate $196,000.00 This estimate does not provide for any stop log systems or bypass pumping.
Option -

(1) New 20Ft wide Stainless Steel Center Gate wfTilting Gate Installed in place and operational.

Estimated turnkey cost for (1) new stainless steel center gate $289,000.00

We appreciate the opportunity and please feel free to contact me with any questions.

Respectfully submitted, Scott M. Snowden

Page 10

4	3	2

B
WATER FLOW

>

EXISTING RADIAL GATE WINCH

SIDE SEALING PLATE_J I	--------	l --..r	.//§n	B

: e :c: - ---

TOP WATER WIER DOOR

High Water

WIER DOOR WINCH

t--

ROUGH OPENING

A--,

209"

STAINLESS CABLE

Elev. 11.5+/- 	 _

30"
OF TOP WATER DELIVERY

A
EXISTING RADIAL GATE

tN_ESS0Ri0lvo1SESf'ECll=IEO:

(5AP.ft11'00
10 •.£1MNCC:S,
lf'.ACltONAI. t

DRAWN

Ct-EC.LEO

I
A_.	J
"""'

°""

A

TITLE:

EXISTING GATE SEAL/PEDESTAL

SECTION A-A

A1'0.AAR.t,V.CH:t 8tM) r
rwo Pl.ACE DCCMAL !
1 £!:PlACCOECw.AL :t

1r Cf0Ml:l»C
P'tOl'llftt..lTAHOCONPIDfHJlAl  TOWI.ANCJ'Gf'Ot

CNGA..Pf>R
MrGA.N'R
OA
C()f,.w.ENJS•

Gate Assembly, SRID

SCALE l: 40

rhENOtMl\l{>ICOUtAll'«:DltiOG ff™.l OW,,Wlt-G G!Hf 10.f Ml()MlliY 0,
P.'-l Me'!AlWOt;Q U.C. NlT
,U, t1r-M!.TOl!:Al4.WHCU t•
Wffl'°'-11 Ill[ WIMJ[.H	Of IUSMUIIIY.'Oll'OUCl1,
pt()t-""1[0_	OONOiSCA1£ '1"tw-G

SIZE DWG. NO.
B
SCALE: 1:96WBGHT:

REV

SHEET1 OF 2

Page 11

4	3	2

CLOSED WEIR DOOR

FULLY OPEN WEIR DOOR

B	e_v.:._0  0_.ti-_	Elev0 .!.._£0_:/.:_	B

Elev. 1l .5 +l-

Eley.J....!..9_±  _

·---- DJS Bev. 5.0+/-

A	A

UM.ESS OTHERWISESf'feflED:
DIM9-CS,c,tc$ AP(., HC!-ES
JCU!l>.t.lCU:
fiACnoNAl1
ANG,U..-.R· ,,.....Ot:t 11,(NQ !
JWO PlACf OECMAL t
Ii  Pv-CEDEC.W.Al. :

11°'1(lf"lt(lGE()MEI ttOPlfOA.n ANCIC()H110tH1UJ.	TOUJt.N-,CNC, f't-'-

°""w"
OKlID

ENGAPl"lf MfGAPf'II,
OA
COMMENll:

NAME	DAil

TITLE:
GATE ASSEMBLY,
SRID

IH( N(WMAIIQtl COtJIJJl..(f) It-' ltl!I	t(MAt
WltlCISllEso..fl'f\'Of"ElnYOl-
LS Mf?AlWC"-l UC ,,HT
l1C)Nr,,1,....-1Q6tAS,,-WH(Jlf  f
wm-ioutrH[V.RJTTOl IOI
RIJ.wtAI.WOO:.SltCG
f"IMll--lMl[-0	DOtlOTSCAU:OIV,',.J--K;

SIZE DWG. NO.
B
SCALE: I :96 W8GHT:

REV

SHEET 2 OF 2

☐ Alachua

☐ Baker

☐ Bradford

☐ Brevard

☐ Clay

☐ Duval

☐ Flagler

☐ Indian River

☐ Lake

☐ Marion

☐ Nassau

☐ Orange

☐ Osceola

☐ Putnam

☐ Seminole

☐ St. Johns

☐ Okeechobee

☐ Volusia

DRAFT
Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Districtwide Cost-Share (FY 2023-2024 DWCS) Application

This form is designed to assist in submitting a complete application for consideration by the St. Johns River Water Management District (District) for Districtwide Cost-Share Program. Detailed guidance on completing this application can be found in the Funding Guidance Document. All sections of the form must be completed to be considered a complete application. Any information listed on the checklist that is not included in the application will result in an automatic deduction of 5 points in the evaluation. If additional space is needed to fully complete a section, please attach separately. County governments, municipalities, water supply authorities, and other interested public and private entities as determined eligible may apply.

A. BASIC INFORMATION	
A-1	NAME OF ENTITY / ORGANIZATION:
Sebastian River Improvement District	
	PROJECT NAME (please see below):
Lateral C Structure - Center Gate Rehabilitation & Modification	
A-2	Contact information of project manager or contact person:	
	(The District will send correspondence concerning this application ONLY to this person)	
	Name/title: B. Frank Sakuma Jr, District Manager	
	Email address: bsakuma@sdsinc.org	
	Mailing address: 2501A Burns Rd, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410	
	Office Phone:(772)345-5119	Mobile Phone: (772)453-0975	
A-3	Contact information of person with authority to enter into a contractual agreement, if other than project manager or contact person:	
	If same as A-2 above, do not complete this section.	
	Name/title:	
	Email address:	
	Mailing address: , ,	
	Office Phone:	Mobile Phone:	
A-4	What County is this project located?
Alachua	☐ Baker	☐ Bradford	☐ Brevard	☐ Clay	☐ Duval
 			 	 	
Flagler	☐✔ Indian River	☐ Lake	☐ Marion	☐ Nassau	☐ Orange
 	  		 	
Osceola	☐ Putnam	☐ Seminole	☐ St. Johns	☐ Okeechobee	☐ Volusia	

□ North Florida

□ Central Springs and East Coast

□ Central Florida

□ Yes □ No

□ Yes □ No

□ Yes □ No

□ Yes □ No

□ Yes □ No

□ Yes □ No

□ Yes □ No

□ Yes □ No

DRAFT

A-5	What Water Supply Planning Region is this project located
North Florida (North Florida Regional Water Supply Partnership/North Florida Water Initiative)

□✔ Central Springs and East Coast
Central Florida (Central Florida Water Initiative)	
A-6	Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs), Basin Management Action Plans (BMAPs), Water Body Identification Number (WBID), Minimum Flows and Levels (MFLs), and Springs
a. Is the project located in an area that has an established TMDL or BMAP?
□✔ Yes □ No
If yes, provide the name of the TMDL waterbody, BMAP, and WBID(s). If no, just provide the WBID(s).	
	Name of TMDL Waterbody:		
	Name of BMAP:	Central Indian River Lagoon	
	WBID(s):		
	Is the project specifically named in the BMAP identified above?  □ Yes □✔ No
If yes, provide the BMAP project number (e.g., VC-3 or LM-4). Be sure that your project name corresponds to the BMAP project name. If your project is part of a BMAP project but is not identical, please provide the BMAP project name and project number that most closely corresponds to your project and explain the relationship between the two in section B-2.
SRID-02	
	b. Does the project benefit a water body with an established MFL?
□ Yes □✔ No
Name of MFL Waterbody:	
	Prevention/Recovery Strategy Implemented for the MFL Waterbody above?
□ Yes  □ No	If yes, provide the name of the Prevention/Recovery Strategy	
	c. Does the project benefit a spring?  □ Yes □✔ No
□ Volusia Blue □ Silver □ Wekiwa/Rock □ DeLeon □ Gemini  □ Other:

Is the project located in a Priority Focus Area (PFA)  □ Yes □✔ No
Is the project is listed in a Prevention Strategy for the implementation of Minimum Flows and Levels? □ Yes □✔ No
If the project is in a Regional Water Supply Plan, list the project number and name:	
A-7	Is the Applicant a Rural Economic Development Initiative (REDI) Community?
Yes □✔ No	If yes, please attach a signed Waiver of Matching Funds Letter	

☐Yes ☐No Ƞ In Progress

☐Yes ☐No Ƞ In Progress

ȠYes Ƞ No

Ƞ Yes  Ƞ No

Ƞ Water Supply

☐ Water Conservation

☐ Water Quality

☐ Flood Protection

☐ Natural Systems

DRAFT

A-8	For County or Municipal applicants: Have you adopted the District's model Landscape
Irrigation Ordinance?
Yes ☐No Ƞ In Progress
For utilities, do you have a water conservation rate structure or condition of service to address irrigation conservation?
Yes ☐No Ƞ In Progress	
A-9	Has the project been submitted under a previous District cost-share program?
ȠYes ✔ȠNo	If yes, provide the date(s) and project name(s) of previous submittal(s).	
A-10	Is the project located within the coastal building zone as defined in Subsection 161.54(1), Florida Statutes?
Ƞ Yes	✔Ƞ No	If yes, please attach, in Section D, a Sea Level Impact Project (SLIP) Study as established in Subsection 161.551(3), Florida Statutes.	
B. PROJECT INFORMATION	
B-1	PROJECT TYPE Check the primary core mission and provide evidence in Section B-3.
Water Supply ☐ Water Conservation ☐✔ Water Quality ☐ Flood Protection ☐ Natural Systems	
B-2	PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Scoring Criterion #1)
a. Short Description: Succinctly describe the project, e.g. what is being constructed or what is the program to be implemented? Attach supporting documentation if necessary.
Design and permitting to replace one of the radial gates in Lateral C outfall structure with a tilting gate. The balance of the gates will not be replaced. The existing gates are the bottom opening style of radial gates which allow sufficient flood protection during significant rainfall events. |	

DRAFT

		
	b. Measures of Success: Describe how you will measure the effectiveness of your project.
The SFWMD radial gate spillway Structure S-71-1-4, aka the Gordy Structure was retrofitted recently to a tilting gate, and it has resulted in nutrient reductions. We expect similar results from the subject project.	

DRAFT

	c. Is this project multi-phased or part of a larger overall effort? If so, describe the larger project. The overall master plan identifying each phase should be described, along with a summary of the status of the previous phase(s), whether complete or not. The summary should contain, at a minimum, whether the previous phase(s) received District cost-share funding, percent complete of the phase(s), and an updated schedule for completion as well as reasons for any schedule delays.
This project will replace one of the three radial gates in the Lateral C outfall Structure. A similar retrofit to the Lateral L outfall Structure will be completed in the future.	
	d. Describe the location and include a map. The map should identify any potentially affected MFL, TMDL, BMAP, impaired water bodies or other affected wetlands or springs. Lateral C Outfall Structure (3 gates) Located 1500+/- LF north of the intersection of Lateral C (82nd Avenue) and CR 510, Indian River County, Upstream Watershed 6,240 +/- Acres.	

DRAFT

	e. Coordinates for the project in decimal degrees to 6 places. Use centroid for large area project area:
Latitude: 27.752758	Longitude: -80.494722	
B-3	BENEFITS TO DISTRICT MISSIONS (Scoring Criterion #2)
Describe the benefits to one or more of the District’s main missions (Water Supply/Conservation, Water Quality, Flood Protection and/or Natural Systems). Clearly identify the primary and secondary mission benefits. Attach separate pages if necessary. Refer to the Funding Guidance Manual for additional pertinent information that should be included with your application.
Primary benefit:
Water Quality Benefits - Currently the radial gates open from the bottom up allowing discharge of nutrients and sediments that have accumulated on the canal bottom, into the lagoon. A tilting gate opening from the top provides clean discharge from the upper water column as sediments and muck remain held in the bottom of the canal by virtue of design. Reduction in sediment transfer to the IRL will moderate damage to the flora and fauna. Gates operating this way reduces necessity of large increments of discharge given by the bottom- opening style gate design not to mention the inevitable flush of sediments they contain. There is not a single improvement to the SRID system that could beneficially impact the IRL as economically and immediately as this proposed alteration to the gate design.	

□ Fresh Groundwater

□ Brackish Groundwater

□ Stormwater

□ Reclaimed Water

□ Surface Water

□ Brackish Surface Water

□ Other: Identify Source

DRAFT

	Secondary benefit(s), if applicable:
Greater flexibility in operating protocol facilitating greater control of water levels upstream of the structure.
This further allows for more responsive adjustment of the water levels between dry and wet season conditions such that maintaining higher levels during the dry season conserves water for agricultural or other uses and lower level attenuation during the wet season provides more volume upstream of the structure and minimizes opening of the bottom discharge. Additionally, reduced sediment | transfer will benefit navigation routes in the IRL and reduce the frequency that the Florida Inland Navigation District is required to dredge.	
B-4	If the Project is for Water Resource Development or Alternative Water Supply Development identify the source water (check all that apply):

Fresh Groundwater
Brackish Groundwater
Stormwater
Reclaimed Water
Surface Water: Identify surface water body:

Brackish Surface Water: Identify surface water body:

Other: Identify Source:	

□ Yes □ No □ in Progress

□ Yes □ No

□ Yes	□ No

DRAFT

B-5	For Septic-to-Sewer Projects:

a. How many residential and/or commercial septic tanks are proposed to be abandoned?

Residential:	Commercial:

If the tank(s) are commercial or multi-family, provide the capacity (daily flow) of the tank.	
	b. Proof of participation. .
How many letters of commitment have you obtained?
Upload copies of all commitment letters. Percent commitment:

Do you have a local ordinance, in accordance with Subsection 381.00655, Florida Statutes, that requires mandatory hookup after written notification of sewerage availability?
□ Yes □ No □in Progress	
	c. Is the project located within a Priority Focus Area of a springshed, or within ¼ mile of the ultimate receiving surface water body, or within a ¼ mile of a drainage ditch or canal that eventually terminates at the receiving surface water body?
□ Yes □ No	
	d. Provide the name of the wastewater treatment plant the sewer will be connected.

Is the wastewater treatment plant providing advanced wastewater treatment (AWT)?
□ Yes	□ No
What type of treated wastewater disposal type is used (rapid infiltration basin, sprayfield, reuse, etc.)?	
B-6	District Permit Information:
If the applicant has an SJRWMD-issued Consumptive Use Permit and or an Environmental Resource Permit for the project site, provide the following:	
	Permit Type:	Permit #	Expir. date/Compliant (yes/ no)	

				

☐ Yes	☐ No

☐ Yes	☐ No

DRAFT

B-7	Project Likelihood of Successful Completion (Scoring Criterion #3)

a. Project Readiness:
Check all that apply and supply requested dates (month/day/year) and attach a detailed project construction schedule. Include documentation that demonstrates that the construction start date is realistic (e.g. critical milestones, commission approval dates, procurement timeline, etc.).	
		Current % Complete	Start Date	Completion Date	
	Planning	30	3/1/2023	4/1/2023	
	Design	30	4/1/2023	5/1/2023	
	Permitting	0	4/1/2023	6/1/2023	
	Bidding	0	6/1/2023	8/1/2023	
	Procurement	0	10/1/2023	10/31/2023	
	Construction	11/1/2023	6/30/2024	
	Future Phases			
	Other			
	b. Local Government / Public Support:
Describe the public support for your project (meetings attended, community workshops, presentations to councils, notification in newsletters, etc.). If your project requires participation from certain communities or homeowners, provide a description of methods used to ensure participation in your project. Provide the percentage of participation that can be documented at the time of the application.	
B-8	Applicant has identified all required permits necessary for project construction.
☐✔ Yes	☐ No	
B-9	Property needed for the project is under its ownership or control..
☐✔ Yes	☐ No	

DRAFT

C. PROJECT COST INFORMATION	
C-1	a. Breakdown of project cost
Attach a table or spreadsheet with detailed project costs for each task or segment of the project. The District will contribute only to the construction costs of the project; however, the table should detail all project costs. Indicate at the end of the table/spreadsheet, a cost effectiveness evaluation as described below.	
	b. Cost-share request funding table
The District's cost-share (4.) cannot exceed 25% of the total construction cost (1.) for Alternative Water Supply, Water Quality, Flood Protection and Natural Systems projects and 50% for Water Conservation projects. RED/ communities that have submitted a waiver, however, can be reimbursed up to 100% of total construction cost. There is a $3,000,000 maximum cost-share request per project or per entity.	
	
1. Total Estimated Construction Cost:	Year 1
$300,000	Year 2
$0	Total
$300,000	
	2. Other Costs (includes capital, land acquisition, planning, design, permitting & bidding costs)	$75,000	
	3. Total Project Costs:	$375,000	
	4.Cost-share amount requested:
Cost-share percentage:	$75,000
25 %	
	5. Estimated Applicant’s Annual Operation & Maintenance Costs:	$0	
	6. Estimated Service life of components:	20	years	
	c. Funding Sources: Identify the Applicant’ funding contribution and all other outside sources of funding including State or Federal appropriations, grant monies, or municipal bonds. Include the status of the specified funding.	
	Funding Source	Amount	% Match	Funding Status	

					

	Total				

□ Yes □ No

☐ Single entity

☐ Multi-jurisdictional

DRAFT

	The District would like to recognize in-kind financial contributions for REDI communities requesting 100% funding of the construction costs. Describe your in-kind contribution and estimate the monetary value of that contribution.	
	This is a State of Florida reimbursement program, with the entire project scope expected to be completed within the funding period, regardless of amount awarded. There is no guarantee the Applicant will be awarded the amount requested. Do you have 75% (or 50% for water conservation projects) of your construction cost funding secured at time of application?
□✔ Yes  □ No	
	d. Project partners: Check one below and if multi-jurisdictional include the percent of funding to be contributed by each partner.
☐✔ Single entity
	Multi-jurisdictional (attach copy of partnership agreement or memorandum of understanding, if available, and includes status of agreement). Identify other partners: .	
C-2	Quantification of Project Benefits: District staff will quantify benefits for Septic-to-Sewer projects, Flood Protection Projects and projects benefiting MFL water bodies using the information provided below and in B-2 and B-3.
Show all work and include assumptions for calculation of quantified benefits. Accepted engineering methods should be used to estimate project benefits, and backup information showing any calculations must be provided. Attach additional pages as needed. Note, if your project is specifically listed within a BMAP, provide the credited nutrient reduction value associated with the project within the BMAP.	
	For Water Supply Projects:
	mgd water supplied	
	For Water Supply/Conservation Projects:
	mgd water conserved
	 mgd water made available within 2 years of construction (programmatic implementation) completion for phase identified
	 mgd water made available when project is completely built out and fully online.
	 MG storage capacity created
	mgd distribution/transmission capacity created.	

	For Water Quality Projects:
14844	Lbs/year TN removed/reduced annually
6027	Lbs/year TP removed/reduced annually	
	For Natural Systems Projects:

	 Acres Wetlands Restored/Enhanced Ac

	 Acres Uplands Restored/Enhanced
	 Linear feet of shoreline Restored/Enhanced	
	For projects that benefit MFL waterbodies:
mgd of water recharged

	 mgd of alternative source to offset withdrawals.	
	For Flood Protection Projects:
Acres protected from flooding

Annual Exceedance probability As is: 1/		 years After project implementation: 1/	 years	
C-3	Cost-Effectiveness (Scoring Criterion #4)
Cost-effectiveness is automatically calculated based on Total Project Cost, Annual Operation & Maintenance Costs, Estimated Service life of components (entered in section C-1b), Quantification of Project Benefits (entered in section C-2), and 2.5% Federal Water Resource Planning Discount Rate.

Water Supply:	per 1000 gallons made available

Water Conservation:			per 1000 gallons conserved
Water Quality:	$2	per lb TN removed

$4	per lb TP removed

Natural Systems:			per acre wetland restored/enhanced
per acre upland restored/enhanced per ft. shoreline restored/enhanced
Flood Protection:			per acre protected from flooding MFL:			 per 1000 gallons of water recharged
per 1000 gallons of alternative source to
offset withdrawals

**District staff will calculate the benefits for Septic to Sewer, Flood Protection, and MFL projects based on the information provided in sections C-1 and C-2 of the application.	
** 5P GJU UFYU JO TQBDF BWBJMBCMF, BMM MJOF CSFBLT JO UFYU FOUSJFT BSF SFQMBDFE XJUI "]" .

Document Type	File	Description	
Application Checklist & Signature Page	Application Checklist and Signature Page.pdf		
Project Map	Attachment A - SRID Location Map.pdf	SRID Overall District Map	
Project Map	Attachment B - watershed Map.pdf	Lateral C Watershed Map	
Project Cost Table	RS Metalworks tilting gate prop.pdf	Proposal	
Benefit Calculation	nutrient removal calcs.pdf	nutrient reduction calculations	

1/;,jwc;
us ti::Sucr_5hl-orJ6-JDn,SY'(	K VF/1	/11o_JBC--1

Total Nitrogen Summary Table	
Average TN concentration (total)	0.92	mgN/L	
Average TN Load (total)	255,597.66	lb/year	
Average TN concentration (gate open)	1.25	mgN/L	
Average TN Load (gate open)	1,116,521.03	lb/year	
Average TN concentration (gate closed)	0.72	mgN/L	
Average TN Load (gate closed)	155,104.42	lb/year	
Average TN concentration (proposed)	1.14	mgN/L	
Average TN Load (proposed)	1,017,782.96	lb/year	

1.40

1.20

:::;- 1.00
tio
E
; o.soo., 2
·0.,:::;
ro

Linear Interpolation
Gate Openining vs TN concentration

1.14
.....0 .........

1.25
..o

0.60

u

QJ

C
8 0.40

0.20

0.00

0	0.5	1	1.5	2
Gate Opening (ft)

2.5	3	3.5	4

.	0.

.	DBHYDRO Data (Gate Op Varies)

.	0.

.	Proposed Conditions (Gate Op= 3 ft)

Step 5

The proposed Total Nitrogen load reduction is therefore,

1,116,521.03 - 1,017,782.96 = 98,738 lbs/year

Arte-A
o'P
WAre-A..5
(A-C[{.Q)
r»2J9	\	15' 11
t/{ ;00	'T 373t

1 ,,_, 6,,):::,.,

Page 29

Total Phosphorous Summary Table	
Average TP concentration (total) Average TP Load (total)	0.19

52,246.32	mgP/L lb/year	
Average TP concentration (gate open)

Average TP Load (gate open)	0.33	mgP/L	
	293,501.10	lb/year	
Average TP concentration (gate closed) Average TP Load (gate closed)	0.11

24,410.92	mgP/L lb/year	
Average TP concentration (proposed)

Average TP Load (proposed)	0.28

253,411.13	mgP/L lb/year	

0.35

0.30

Linear Interpolation
Gate Openining vs TP concentration

0.28

0.33
. o

0.25
E

·······•···

...0.

.......

-;- 0.20
0
·.;::;
ro

0.15
ru	0. 1

C

u
8 0.10

0.05

·······

0.00

0	0.5	1	1.5	2
Gate Opening (ft}

2.5	3	3.5	4

......o ...... DBHYDRO Data (Gate Op Varies)	......o	Proposed Conditions (Gate Op= 3 ft)

Step 5

The proposed Total Phosphorous load reduction is therefore,

Page 30

293,501.10 - 253,411.13 = 40,090 lbs/year

R&S Metalworks & Co.

Sebastian River Improvement District To: Board of Supervisors

12/9//12

Re: Lateral C Structure - Center Gate Rehabilitation and Modification

R&S Metalworks recently did some structural repairs to all (3) radial gates at the SRID Lateral C water control. We replaced and repaired structural angles on all (3) three of the gates at this structure. The angles we replaced hold the gate in place against the upstream head water. These angles also enable the gate to pivot up and down. The new hot dip galvanized angles we installed replacing the old, corroded angles will last 20 plus years if maintained.
This structure has (2) 12ft wide gates on each side and (1) 20ft wide gate in the center.

Tilting Weir Gate Retrofit -

R&S Metalworks has designed a top water delivery system that can be retrofitted to an existing radial gate. This tilting weir gate system as shown in our illustration is fully adjustable in elevation.

We are providing an estimated cost to rehabilitate your (1) existing center gate and retrofit it with a tilting weir gate system to provide adjustable top water delivery.

Our scope of work and supply is as follows:

Disconnect and remove (1) gate with crane.
Transport (1) gate to be repaired.
Pressure wash, brush blast all corroded areas to be repaired.
Remove all the existing rubber seals.
Replace lower (3) horizontal channels.
Relace lower 48" of radius plate.
Replace all channel reinforcement gussets.
Replace all rubber seals.
Clean and prep the entire gate, brush blast all bare metal areas to be recoated with cold galvanize.
Re- coat the entire gate with heavy zinc cold galvanizing.

5690 Carlton Rd
Port St. Lucie, FL 34987

PHONE	(772) 466-3303
FAX	(772) 466-3333
EMAIL	SCOTT@RSMETALWORKS.COM

Tilting Weir Gate Retrofit-

The tilting weir gate would be retrofitted to the (1) 20 ft wide center gate only.

Fabricate and install new tilt gate system to the existing 20ft wide cent gate.
Install structural reinforcement to the existing gate.
Machine and fabricate tilt gate operator.

Installation-

Transport and reinstall the modified gates in place.
Install tilt gate operator system.
Perform all testing of the gates and seal system.

Estimated turnkey cost for the modification of the (1) existing center gate $196,000.00 This estimate does not provide for any stop log systems or bypass pumping.
Option-

(1) New 20Ft wide Stainless Steel Center Gate w/Tilting Gate Installed in place and operational.

Estimated turnkey cost for (1) new stainless steel center gate $289,000.00

We appreciate the opportunity and please feel free to contact me with any questions.

Respectfully submitted, Scott M. Snowden

Page 33

4	3	2

>

B
WATER FLOW

EXISTING RADIAL GATE WINCH

SIDE SEALING PLATE

--:=

B

TOP WATER WIER DOOR

High Water

::e ::-7 ---

WIER DOOR WINCH

STAINLESS CABLE

ROUGH OPENING

209"

Bev. 11.5 +/- 	 _

30"
OF TOP WATER DELIVERY

A
UNlW OTHERWESPEECJRED:

G;,,J:-fN1tfO<S
lo.Dt,\NCU;
rP.ACTtOHAl:
MACH: 8U<> t
IWO PlAClOC<:MAAL !

°""WN
C><OEO
O,,,C.-J>f'1.

A .J	A
N,,t,M;	OArt

TITlE:
Gate Assembly,

SECTION A-A SCALE 1: 40

lt«(ff'\A.C[Oocw.AI.!

tfTUll"llflC(.Ol••C:Tll:IC
noraa.uTAHDCOfrMODfflAl  TOl.t.lt,V,OGl'Ot:
tlf:1740Dr,,l,AloiCOff'IAl'<DN
C.A ISfHf: ff't()l>UITYOf ll!U MflAI.WOU. UC. ANT
'-U'tCOtC"DONt-l Nlt()lt-.lA...,_HOl.1,
WffiCUltHEWl!ll"l[H O,.
MCfJ\J. UC
f'1K>tt«TtD.	OONOT DIV,.-...

MICAM't.

OA.
c°"""""'

SRID
SIZE DWG. NO.
B
SCALE: 1:96 WBGHT:

REV

i
SHEET1 OF2 I

Page 34

4	3	2

CLOSED WEIRDOOR

FULLY OPEN WEIR DOOR

B·	B

A	A
INfSS011-ERWISE SPEOREO;	DAfl

cSAll:tt4NCl'C IOl.ERANCU:
ru.cnONAU MACH.: M:t<>: TWOP\ACEOCCMAL : Tt«EE PLACE: OC<.IMAL t
r4lt.lt"UTCCOMf:f1JC
l'IOl'WLUT AMO CONPIODfllAl	101.!.JW-O,,G f'U..

""-'WN
=•m
ENC .....

MfC .
OA
C :

llllE:
GATE ASSEMBLY,
SRID

111(• :o,co,,.,»m .. nG	-.v.lD.W..
l)lt,\'l'!lfGr.n-E fO,,
&'LS Mf!ALWCrt.1. UC. Nff
UONN, Ol"ASAwt<llL fll-04 Wlfl10UI' tM(YlmltN IOI R.UM(1AlWOtt1UC
co.	oo...orKAl.foitAI\NC

SIZE DWG. NO.
B

SC

ALE: 1:9

-	6 W8GHT:

REV

SHEET20F2

Page 35

Page 36

Page 37

Page 38

r  Sep.25,09,9:36AM	N:IGAS\P\08-043E SRID\dwg\Exhibit A.dwg, HWM (2)

LATERAL C GATE

SR9 15.97

SR8 14.14

I) RG-4

LATERAL L GATE

60"0 CULVERT
SR11 15.67

I) RG-3

SR7 17.50

th Ave

BYPASS CANAL

15.30
SR10

SR12 18.97

SR6 16.48

SR5 17.29

65th St

LATERAL L SUB-BASIN 4,415± AC

82nd Ave

66th Ave

I) RG-2

LATERAL L

LATERAL C SUB-BASIN 6,239± AC

SR4 17.38

66th Ave

LATERAL C

82nd Ave

41st St

18.34 I
SR2
I)

L	 

RG-1

18.20  I
SR3 J

'r-

18.32
SR1

'
,r

: , •

¢AI:;. . CARTER ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS
1708 21st STREET, VERO BEACH, FL 32960
TEL: (772) 562-4191	FAX: (772) 562-7180

Spetember 2009 08-43e

":: v

KWN GAS
PLOTBY : K; """''"
REF.#

Sebastian River Improvement District
Stormwater Model

.....-

2009

---	...:'.'!j -B.&PG.;	.,I\.	Watershed Map

COUNTY HWY 512

OL STURCTURE

ATERAL "L" CONTROL STRUCTURE

R12E

60" FLASHBOARD RISER

C3W

@)
V///////,-OGE

a,

>en
0
>z
r >

@	!i	®
R14E

I-IOl!ARTRD. 77THST.

C4W

0

0	UJll£R RO. 73RO ST.

C5W

N. WM£R BEN::H RO. 69TH STR£ET
i

C6W

C7W

CBW

SWINTERBfACHRCW:>65THST.

®

P[rJ,NRD. 61STST.

STORM RD.57THST.

SEBASTIAN IMPROVEMENT
OVERALL

VII RIVER
DISTRICT MAP

651HST

C9W

C1;1W

V///////QW/////////1

l<IN R0.5JRDST.

LINDSEY RD. 49TH ST.

NGlffORORO,I.D45THST.

it
II
0	1500	3000
S ALE: (1 Inch = 3000 Feet)

ci
C13E

C14E

C15E

t"""° ROAD 41STST.
r >
r-;

'

IIARB[RAVE.37THST.

ct£RRYLN. 33RDST.

WN..J([RAI/£.. 26TH ST.

LEGEND

c::::::::J

L.ATERAL/SUBLATERAL MAINTAINED BY DISTRICT

IZ'ZZZ2Z2J

L.ATERAL/SUBLATERAL NOT MAINTAINED BY DISTRICT

!i

!

DISTRICT R/W ONLY, NO SUBLATERAL

1i

la	NO DISTRICT
OWNERSHIP OR R/W

@

I

2"1HST

Page 40

Cost-Share Program Application Checklist and Signature Page

x  Dates are within timeframes prescribed in the Funding Guidance Document
n/a  REDi Waiver of Matching Funds document is attached for REDi projects (if applicable)
x  Detailed project construction schedule with backup
n/a Construction phasing information (if applicable)
x Detailed project cost breakdown
x Calculations for quantification of project benefits
x Cost effectiveness calculations and a copy of the cost effectiveness calculator for water supply/water conservation or water quality projects
x Applicant has identified all required permits necessary for project construction

i certify that all information entered in the online application system and the attached document(s), if applicable, is true and correct.

Name (print):

	8 .  F r a n k  S a k u m a ,  J r .	

Title:

	D i s t r i c t  M a n a g e r	

_____________________________

Signature: _ 			

gnature of the person with authori

* Si	ty to enter into a contractual agreement.

Date:  01/31/2023	

*District Manager authorization provided at a publicly noticed meeting of the 8oard of Supervisors.

Page 1 of 1

Sebastian River Improvement District - Indian River County Fire Station 7 Interlocal Agreement

This Interlocal Agreement (“Interlocal Agreement”) is entered into as of the    day of
	, 2023 (“Effective Date”), between Indian River County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (“County”), and the Sebastian River Improvement District, an independent special district of the State of Florida constituted as provided in Chapter 2007-309, Laws of Florida (“District”).
Whereas, County desires to obtain a District roadway permit (“Permit”) to cross 30-feet of District property for the construction of an access road to Fire Station 7 (“Access Road”); and

Whereas, District has future plans for this 30-feet of property for a canal to convey water to the west (“Conveyance Project”); and

Whereas, as a condition of issuing the Permit, District has required County to install a box culvert or other appropriate water channeling structure to convey stormwater under the Access Road (“Access Crossing Structure”) upon implementation of the Conveyance Project; and

Whereas, County has requested deferral of the requirement to install the Access Crossing Structure to a future date when the Conveyance Project is implemented; and

Whereas, County and District agree that the installation of the Access Crossing Structure will be deferred until the Conveyance Project is implemented; and

Whereas, County agrees to be responsible for all costs associated with design and installation of the Access Crossing Structure upon implementation of the Conveyance Project; and

Whereas, with this assurance, District agrees to issue the roadway permit to cross 30-feet of District property for the construction of the Access Road.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual benefits, undertakings and covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
Section 1. Adoption of “Whereas” Clauses. The foregoing “Whereas” clauses are true and
correct and are incorporated herein.
Section 2. Installation of Access Crossing Structure. In exchange for the issuance of a permit by District for a roadway permit to cross 30-feet of District property for the construction of the Access Road, County agrees to design and install, at County’s sole expense, the Access Crossing Structure upon District’s implementation of the Conveyance Project as depicted in the attached exhibit.
District shall provide written notice to the County that District is entering the design phase of the Conveyance Project at least 60 days prior to the time the design process commences. District shall provide written notice to County that it is implementing construction of the

1

Conveyance Project not less than one hundred eighty (180) days prior to commencing construction, which notice shall include an anticipated completion date for such Project (“Anticipated Completion Date”).
County shall obtain District approval of the design of the Access Crossing Structure prior to commencing installation, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld so long as the design provides for a maximum allowable head loss through the Structure that is not greater than 0.05 feet based upon design flow. The District and County shall confer to develop a mutually acceptable solution if the above maximum allowable head loss through the Access Crossing Structure is not obtainable due to the limited available width of the District drainage right-of-way.
County agrees to complete construction of the Access Crossing Structure not later than the Anticipated Completion Date. County further agrees that the Access Road shall be subject to removal by District if the Access Crossing Structure is not completed by the actual completion date of the Conveyance Project.
Section 3. Indemnification of District. Solely to the extent permitted by law, and in no event greater than the limits set forth in Florida Statutes, Section 768.28, the County agrees to fully defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the District, its agents, officials and employees from any actions, claims or demands which anyone (individual or corporation) may hereafter bring or assert on account of any damages or claims of any type whatsoever which may arise from this Agreement including, but not limited to, claims for contribution, indemnification, subrogation or for pro rata share of responsibility pursuant to the Tort Reform and Insurance Act of 1986 and subsequent amendments including all attorneys' fees, interest, and costs of any kind (not limited to taxable costs) associated with said lawsuits or claims and expressly agrees to pay all costs and attorneys' fees incurred in defending said lawsuits or claims and any resulting awards or judgments in full arising out of said lawsuits or claims, including interest thereon.
Section 4. No Third-Party Beneficiary. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, this Agreement is solely for the benefit of the named parties, and no enforceable right or cause of action shall accrue hereunder to or for the benefit of any entity or individual not a named party hereto.
Section 5. Notices. Any notice required hereunder shall be in writing and shall be delivered by personal delivery, courier, express or overnight mail, or certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to the appropriate party as follows:
If to County:	Public Works Director Indian River County 1801 27th Street
Vero Beach, Florida 32960

If to District:	District Manager
Sebastian River Improvement District c/o Special District Services, Inc.
2501A Burns Road
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410

2

Section 6. Filing; Effective Date. This Agreement shall be filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Indian River County, Florida, for recording in the public records of the County, and shall be effective as of the date of such filing.

IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties have set their hands and seals as of the date entered
above.

Attest:	INDIAN RIVER COUNTY

By: 	
Clerk	Chair, Board of County Commissioners
Approved as to legal form and sufficiency By: 	
Dylan Reingold, County Attorney

Attest:	SEBASTIAN	RIVER	IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT

By: 	
Secretary	Chair, Board of Supervisors

3

From: George Simons
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2023 9:32 AM
To: Joseph Schulke <jschulke@sbsengineers.com>
Cc: billh@ghohomes.com; Frank Sakuma (bsakuma@sdsinc.org) <bsakuma@sdsinc.org>; Todd Wodraska (TWodraska@sdsinc.org) <TWodraska@sdsinc.org>
Subject: RE: HAWKS GROVE

Good Morning Joe,

The aerial didn’t show up on Sheet C-001. Please resend. We focused on IRFWCD Canal maintenance and west dike issues at the November meeting. We expected to discuss the SRID R-O-W impacts at the meeting last Friday but as you are aware SRID representatives didn’t attend that meeting.

Moving the entrance south does reduce the roadway length where the SRID R-O-W issues occur. If your intention is to move forward with utilizing any part of the SRID R-O-W, you should follow the SRID policy regarding the same. The process of selling and/or swapping R-O-W is covered in the attached the R-O- W policy.

Thanks

George A. Simons, P.E.
Principal
Carter Associates, Inc.
1708 21st Street
Vero Beach, FL 32960
Office: 772 562-4191 EXT.111
Fax :772 562-7180
Email: Georges@carterassoc.com Website: www.carterassoc.com

From: Joseph Schulke <jschulke@sbsengineers.com>
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2023 5:39 PM
To: George Simons <georges@carterassoc.com>
Cc: billh@ghohomes.com
Subject: HAWKS GROVE

George – attached are plan sheets and survey we provided at our meeting with Rich at irc. I will give you a call to discuss.

I have a concern after briefly discussing the project today. My understanding at our meeting in November was that the R/W swap between SRID and IRC in front of the church (from 26th to c-15) would eliminate any impacts to SRID use and needs in this area, together with the suggestion to move the development entrance and bridge south, which would minimize impact in the SRID R/W north of C-15. This would create an acceptable route for 74th Ave and access to the site with minimal impact and minimal use of SRID R/W. However, during our phone conversation, you indicated that the applicant may have to look to the adjacent private property (north of c-15, west of 74th ave) to purchase property and then swap that land with the SRID to eliminate any impacts to SRID ROW north of c-15.

We did not have these drawings to reference during our conversation. Please review and then we can revisit. I will give you a call later this week.

Thanks

Best regards,
Joseph W. Schulke, P.E., LEED AP
Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard LLC
1717 Indian River Boulevard, Ste. 201 Vero Beach, Florida 32960
(772) 770-9622 phone
(772) 770-9496 fax
www.sbsengineers.com

From: Seth Goss <sgoss@sbsengineers.com>
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2023 3:39 PM
To: Joseph Schulke <jschulke@sbsengineers.com>
Subject: HAWKS GROVE

Seth Goss

Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, LLC

1717 Indian River Boulevard, Suite 201 Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Phone:772-770-9622

Fax: 772-770-9496

SEBASTIAN RIVER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT

Revised Guidelines for the Sale, Transfer, or Exchange of Surplus Lands Adopted July 13, 2022
Authorization and Purpose. The Board of Supervisors (“Board”) of the Sebastian River Improvement District (“SRID” or “District”) is authorized by Section 4(1)(b) of Chapter 2007-309, Laws of Florida, “to convey and dispose of such real or personal property as may be necessary or convenient to carry out the purposes of” Chapter 2007-309 and Chapter 298, Florida Statutes. The Board will exercise such authorization and dispose of any District land or interest in land determined to be surplus in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in these Guidelines. The Board shall take diligent measures to dispose of surplus lands only in the best interest of the public, and for that purpose restricts the sale, transfer, or exchange of such surplus lands to persons and entities who either (i) hold fee title to adjacent land, or (ii) hold the underlying fee title to land encumbered by an SRID easement (each a “Qualified Applicant”). These Guidelines do not apply to the granting of easements, rights-of-way, or leases of District property.

Application and Supporting Materials. A Qualified Applicant may initiate a request that District lands be declared surplus by submitting a letter to the District Manager including the following information and supporting materials:

Name, including the name of the person representing the Qualified Applicant if not an individual, together with an address, telephone number, and other pertinent contact information.

A non-refundable application/processing fee in the amount of $500.00 payable to the SRID.

An initial professional fee deposit of $2,500.00 payable to the SRID, to be applied to the payment of professions fees and costs incurred by the District in reviewing the application, including but not limited to engineering, surveying, and attorneys’ fees. Fees incurred by the District in excess of the initial deposit will be the responsibility of the applicant. Any deposit balance exceeding the actual costs incurred by the District will be refunded to the applicant at the conclusion of any resulting transaction or following any withdrawal or denial of the application.

A boundary survey of the District lands requested to be declared surplus meeting minimum technical standards, including an accurate legal description and acreage calculation.

Evidence of title that the applicant (a) holds fee title to land adjacent to the District lands requested to be declared surplus, or (b) holds the underlying fee title to land encumbered by an SRID easement.

1

A statement describing the applicant’s proposed use or development of the District lands requested to be declared surplus.

A statement describing how the proposed sale, transfer, or exchange is in the best interest of the public.

An appraisal, obtained by and at the expense of the applicant but certified to the SRID, performed by a person certified as a certified general appraiser under Part II, Chapter 475, Florida Statutes, or by a member of an approved appraisal organization. If the SRID determines that an appraisal review or a second appraisal should be secured, the applicant shall be responsible for the cost of such appraisal review or second appraisal.

Any other survey, engineering, or technical information that the applicant deems necessary for the SRID to evaluate the request that District lands be declared surplus, including but not limited to local government, regional water management district, or state agency reports.

Application Review. The District Manager, together with the District Engineer, shall review each application requesting that District lands be declared surplus for completeness and compliance with these Guidelines, and may require the applicant to provide additional information as necessary to evaluate the request. Upon the District Manager and District Engineer completing review of an application to declare District lands surplus:

Option Agreement. If preliminarily determining to recommend approval of the application, the District Manager shall negotiate an option agreement for the sale, transfer, or exchange of the District lands that the applicant has requested be declared surplus, which option shall be subject to acceptance, review, and approval by the Board as provided in these Guidelines.

The option agreement shall be in such form and content, and subject to such conditions, as the District Manager, in consultation with the District Engineer and District counsel, determine appropriate in the circumstances.

Any sale, transfer, or exchange of District lands shall be on an “as is,” “where is,” and “with all faults” basis, with no representation or warranty by the SRID of any kind or nature whatsoever, and with the applicant solely responsible for determining the suitability of such lands for the applicant’s intended use.

The applicant shall be responsible for all costs of the sale, transfer, or exchange, including but not limited to title search and title insurance expenses, settlement or closing fees, recording expenses, and documentary stamp taxes.

2

Each negotiated option agreement shall be presented to the Board at a regular or special meeting to determine whether the District should proceed with an advertised public hearing to consider approval.

If the Board determines to proceed with consideration of the option agreement, it shall schedule and direct notice of a public hearing to be held on not less than thirty (30) days’ advertised notice, which notice shall be published at the expense of the applicant. The option agreement, and the SRID’s obligation to close, shall be subject to approval of Board following the public hearing.

If the Board determines not to proceed with consideration of the option agreement, the application shall be deemed denied and any unexpended portion of the professional fee deposit shall be refunded to the applicant.’

Other Action. If preliminarily determining to recommend denial, the District Manager shall present the application, all supporting information submitted by the applicant, and the recommendations of the District Manager and District Engineer to the Board for action either (a) denying the application or (b) directing the District Manager to negotiate an option agreement as provided in Section C.1 of these guidelines.

Board Hearing and Consideration of Option Agreement. At any public hearing to consider an option agreement for the sale, transfer, or exchange of District lands, the Board shall consider the application, all supporting information submitted by the applicant, the recommendations of the District Manager and the District Engineer, and any public comment. Following the public hearing, the Board shall determine:

Whether the District lands proposed for sale, transfer, or exchange are surplus as no longer used or useful by the SRID, or may be deemed surplus with appropriate reservations of flowage, drainage, retention, access, or maintenance easements or other rights;

Whether the proposed sale, transfer, or exchange is in the best interest of the SRID and the public;

Whether the option agreement should be approved; and

Whether the Chair and other members of the Board, the District Manager, the officers, attorneys, and other agents and employees of the SRID (a) should be authorized to do all acts and things required of them by the option agreement, or desirable or consistent with the requirements of the option agreement, for the full, punctual, and complete performance of the terms, covenants, and agreements contained within it, and (b)

3

should be authorized and directed to execute and deliver any and all papers and instruments and to cause to be done any and all acts and things necessary or proper for closing and carrying out the transactions contemplated under the option agreement, including but not limited to terminating, cancelling, or annulling the option agreement upon the failure of any material term, condition, or contingency.

Closing. If the Board approves an option agreement for the sale, transfer, or exchange of District lands, then upon determining that all material terms, conditions, and contingencies have been satisfied or waived, the Chair and other members of the Board, the District Manager, the officers, attorneys, and other agents and employees of the SRID shall proceed to close the sale, transfer, or exchange in accordance with such terms, conditions, and contingencies.

4

PROP. W.Q. SWALE

LAST SAVED: 1/20/2023 2:56:25 PM; SAVED BY: SETH GOSS; DRAWING: J:\2021\21-236 GHO HAWKS GROVE 33RD ST - 43 ACRES C3D\PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\PRELIMINARY PLAT\21-236 C-800 74TH OFF SITE.DWG; PLOT DATE: 1/23/2023 1:26:21 PM; PLOTTED BY: SETH GOSS

EXIST. CANAL

EXIST. UNIMPROVED ROW

  A	74TH AVE ROAD IMPROVMENTS 
SCALE: 1" = 50'

28'

CONSTRUCT BRIDGE

14' 14'
6'

28'

14' 14'

26TH STREET

6'

A

74TH AVE ROAD IMPROVMENTS
SCALE: 1" = 50'

EXIST. CANAL

PROPOSED SEWER FM

EXIST. UNIMPROVED ROAD

PROP. 24' WIDE ROAD WITH F CURB/GUTTER

PROP. W.Q. SWALE

200'

  A	74TH AVE ROAD IMPROVMENTS 
SCALE: 1" = 50'

BS

PROPOSED WATER MAIN

CATHOLIC CHURCH

C-800
21-236

HAWKS GROVE P.D.
7255 33RD ST VERO BEACH, FLORIDA INDIAN RIVER COUNTY

74TH AVE OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS

1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960
TEL 772 / 770-9622  FAX 772 / 770-9496  EMAIL info@sbsengineers.com

PROP. W.Q. SWALE

JWS JT JWS
AS NOTED 01/22/20

N	GENERAL NOTES:

HATCH LEGEND

ABBREVIATION LEGEND

PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT:

PROPOSED LAND USE

ENGINEER:

SET PRM

LOT 6
15,093 SF

LOT 5
11,547 SF

UNDEVELOPED ZONING: A-1 LAND USE:AG-1

LOT 7
9,946 SF

LOT 8
10,800 SF

LOT 9
11,129 SF

LOT 10
14,870 SF

SINGLE FAMILY HOME
ZONING: RS-3 LAND USE: L-1

SET PRM

D

SINGLE FAMILY HOME
ZONING: A-1 LAND USE: AG-1

LITTORAL AREA 13,002 SF

TRACT G OPEN SPACE/ STORM WATER 26,862 SF
(0.62 AC)
SET PRM

SET PRM

S

UNDEVELOPED ZONING: A-1 LAND USE:AG-1

SINGLE FAMILY HOME
ZONING: A-1 LAND USE: L-1

TRACT LS3
25' LANDSCAPE BUFFER
24,275 SF
(0.56 AC)

TRACT M

SET PRM

LOT 20
10,664 SF

LOT 21
11,243 SF

LOT 22
13,657 SF

SET PRM

TRACT	DESIGNATION	AREA	RECREATION  OPEN SPACE

SF  AC  %  AC  %  AC
LS1  LANDSCAPE BUFFER *	31,500  0.72  0%  0.00  100%	0.72
LS2  LANDSCAPE BUFFER *	61,347  1.41  0%  0.00  100%	1.41
LS3  LANDSCAPE BUFFER *	24,275  0.56  0%  0.00  100%	0.56
LS4  LANDSCAPE BUFFER *	78,639  1.81  0%  0.00  100%	1.81
LS5  LANDSCAPE BUFFER *	36,492  0.84  0%  0.00  100%	0.84
A  RIGHT OF WAY **	220,185  5.05  0%  0.00  15%	0.76
B  STORMWATER (TOTAL)	157,007  3.60  0%  0.00  100%	0.00
- NWL	101,221  2.32  0%  0.00  100%	2.32
- GREEN	55786  1.28  31%  0.40  100%	1.28
C  STORMWATER (TOTAL)	82,011  1.88  0%  0.00  100%	0.00
- NWL	47,745  1.10  0%  0.00  100%	1.10
- GREEN	34266  0.79  21%  0.17  100%	0.79
D  RECREATION	5,790  0.13  100%  0.13  100%	0.13
E  RECREATION	7,425  0.17  100%  0.17  100%	0.19
F  RECREATION	10,038  0.23  100%  0.23  100%	0.23
G  OPEN SPACE/STORMWATER	26,862  0.62  100%  0.62  100%	0.62
H  RECREATION	6,951  0.16  100%  0.16  100%	0.16
I   RECREATION	6,059  0.14  100%  0.14  100%	0.14
J  RECREATION	9,566  0.22  100%  0.22  100%	0.22
K  RECREATION	8,996  0.21  100%  0.21  100%	0.21
L  RECREATION	2,890  0.07  100%  0.07  100%	0.07
M  OPENSPACE/ UTILITY	3,394  0.08  0%  0.00  100%	0.08
N  RECREATION	3,372  0.08  100%  0.08  100%	0.08
O  RECREATION	11,555  0.27  100%  0.27  100%	0.27
P  RECREATION	6,504  0.15  100%  0.15  100%	0.15
Q  RECREATION	5,399  0.12  100%  0.12  100%	0.12
R  RECREATION	7,291  0.17  100%  0.17  100%	0.17
S  RECREATION	5,320  0.12  100%  0.12  100%	0.12
T  RECREATION	14,845  0.34  100%  0.34  100%	0.34
LOTS  96 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ***	1,072,473 24.62  0%  0.00  30%	7.39
TOTAL	1,906,186 43.76 8.6%  3.76 50.9%	22.27
PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT

PROJECT LOCATIONS:

SITE ADDRESS:

TAX I.D. NO:

FLOOD ZONE:

GROSS AREA:

JWS JT JWS
AS NOTED 01/22/20

TOTAL DEVELOPABLE AREA: EXISTING ZONING/LAND USE: PROPOSED MAINTENANCE ENTITY: DEDICATION OF IMPROVEMENTS:

MEANS OF CONVEYANCE OF OWNERSHIP:

CONSTRUCTION START: CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION:

REQUIRED PERMITS:

LAST SAVED: 1/20/2023 12:18:09 PM; SAVED BY: SETH GOSS; DRAWING: J:\2021\21-236 GHO HAWKS GROVE 33RD ST - 43 ACRES C3D\PRODUCTION DRAWINGS\PRELIMINARY PLAT\21-236 C-100 PRELIMINARY PLAT.DWG; PLOT DATE: 1/20/2023 12:18:25 PM; PLOTTED BY: SETH GOSS

OPEN SPACE/UTILITY 3,394 SF
(0.07 AC)

SHEET INDEX

AREAS

CODE (RS-3)

PROP. P.D.

LOT 4

TRACT LS2 50' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 61,347 SF (1.41 AC)

10,952 SF

LOT 3
10,800 SF

S
HAWKS GROVE CIRCLE

S

  TRACT A 223,322 SF    ROW (5.13 AC)

TRACT F REC 10,038 SF
(0.23 AC)

D

S

LOT 64
14,067 SF

LOT 65
10,800 SF

D

D

LOT 66

LOT 11
10,800 SF

S

LOT 12
10,800 SF

D

LOT 13
10,800 SF

LOT 14
10,736 SF

S

TRACT I REC 6,059 SF
(0.14 AC)

SET PRM

LITTORAL AREA 9,810 SF

LOT 15
10,800 SF

LOT 16
10,800 SF

LOT 17
10,819 SF

LOT 18
11,354 SF

SET PRM

LOT 19
14,643 SF

TRACT L REC
2,890 SF  S
(0.06 AC)

LOT 23
9,996 SF

LOT 24
10,800 SF

RIGHT-OF-WAY	50' WIDE 42' WIDE
MIN LOT SIZE	12,000  9,500
MIN LOT WIDTH	80	80
MIN YARD SETBACK *
FRONT (BLDG)	25	20'
SIDE (BLDG)	15	10'

TRACT LS4 50' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 78,639 SF (1.80 AC)

REAR (BLDG)	25	15'
MAX BLDG HEIGHT	35	35
DEVELOPMENT OPEN SPACE  40%  50.9% LOT COVERAGE
MAX BLDG COVERAGE	30%	40%
MAX IMPERVIOUS AREA	60%	70%
MIN OPEN SPACE	40%	30%

EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS:

PROPOSED NATIVE UPLANDS (CONSERVATION): PROJECT PHASING:

STREET SIGN:

LOT 2
10,800 SF

LOT 63
10,775 SF

10,800 SF

LOT 67
10,800 SF

S	HAWKS GROVE CIRCLE	S

LOT 25

HAWKS POINTE LANE

10,800 SF

D

NOTE*
ALL IMPACTS TO THE RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE SODDED WITHIN THREE DAYS OF FINAL GRADING

PUBLIC BENEFITS

ROADWAYS:

PARKING / TRAFFIC CIRCULATION:

1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960
TEL 772 / 770-9622  FAX 772 / 770-9496  EMAIL info@sbsengineers.com

SHEET C-102 SHEET C-101

LOT 1
10,800 SF

LOT 55
10,800 SF

LOT 54
10,800 SF

TRACT LS1 50' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 31,500 SF (0.72 AC)

LOT 53
10,800 SF

LOT 52
10,800 SF

LOT 51
10,923 SF

LOT 50
12,061 SF

S	LOT 62
10,800 SF

LOT 61
10,800 SF

LOT 60
10,800 SF

LOT 59
10,800 SF

S

LOT 58
10,800 SF

LOT 57
10,800 SF

TRACT E REC 7,425 SF
(0.17 AC)

D

LITTORAL AREA 7,966 SF

SHEET C-102 SHEET C-101

TRACT B STORMWATER 157,007 SF
(3.60 AC) NWL=15.8

LITTORAL AREA 9,266 SF

LOT 68
10,910 SF

TRACT R REC
7,291 SF
(0.18 AC)

D

TRACT H REC
6,951 SF
(0.16 AC)

LOT 69
10,800 SF

LOT 70
10,800 SF

LOT 71
10,800 SF

LOT 72
10,800 SF

LOT 73
10,800 SF

TRACT J REC 9,566 SF
(0.22 AC)

HAWKS VIEW LANE

S

S

LOT 83
10,800 SF

D

LOT 82
10,800 SF

LOT 81
10,800 SF

LOT 80
10,800 SF

LOT 79
10,800 SF TRACT P
REC 6,504 SF
(0.15 AC)

D

LOT 84
10,800 SF

LOT 85
10,874 SF

LITTORAL AREA 2,747 SF

TRACT C STORMWATER 82,011 SF
(1.88 AC) NWL=15.8

LITTORAL AREA 4,912 SF

LOT 86
10,874 SF

D

D

LOT 87
10,791 SF

LOT 88
10,800 SF

LOT 89
10,800 SF

LOT 90
10,800 SF

LOT 91
10,800 SF

S

  HAWKS GROVE CIRCLE 

TRACT K REC 8,996 SF
(0.20 AC)

S

S

LOT 26
10,800 SF

LOT 27
10,800 SF

LOT 28
10,800 SF

LOT 29
10,800 SF

LOT 30
10,800 SF

LOT 31
10,800 SF

TRACT N REC
3,372 SF

SINGLE FAMILY HOME
ZONING: A-1 LAND USE: L-1

(0.08 AC)

UNDEVELOPED ZONING: A-1 LAND USE:AG-1

SHEET C-102 SHEET C-101

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT:

STREET LIGHTING:

UTILITY PROVIDERS:

CONCEPTUAL / PRELIMINARY P.D. PLAN

MAXIMUM DWELLING UNIT COMPUTATION:

RECREATION SPACE REQUIREMENTS:

LITTORAL AREA CALCULATION:

OPEN SPACE CALCULATION:

TRACT D REC
5,790 SF
(0.13 AC)

LOT 56
10,800 SF TRACT S
REC 5,320 SF
(0.12 AC)

LOT 78
10,800 SF

LOT 77
10,800 SF

LOT 76
10,800 SF

LOT 75
10,800 SF

LOT 74
10,800 SF

LOT 96
10,800 SF

LOT 95
10,800 SF

LOT 94
10,800 SF

LOT 93
10,800 SF

LOT 92
10,800 SF

TRACT O REC
11,555 SF
(0.26 AC)

LOT 32
10,800 SF

HAWKS GROVE P.D.
7355 33RD ST VERO BEACH, FLORIDA INDIAN RIVER COUNTY

PROJECT PERIMETER P.D SETBACKS TO MAIN STRUCTURES
NORTH  EAST  SOUTH  WEST

D	LOT 33
10,921 SF
S

TRAFFIC SUMMARY:

972

REAR  (40'/65')* 65	40	65
SIDE  60'	60	35	NA
OTHER SETBACKS

S

S

Page 52

TRACT T REC 14,845 SF
(0.34 AC)

S

LOT 49
17,797 SF

LOT 48
10,800 SF

LOT 47
10,800 SF

D

LOT 46
10,800 SF

S 

LOT 45
10,800 SF

HAWKS GROVE CIRCLE

LOT 44
10,800 SF

LOT 43
10,800 SF

LOT 42
10,800 SF

S

TRACT Q REC
5,399 SF
(0.12 AC)

LOT 41
10,800 SF

LOT 40
10,800 SF

S

LOT 39
10,800 SF

LOT 38
10,800 SF

D

LOT 37
10,800 SF

LOT 36
10,801 SF

S

LOT 35
17,790 SF

LOT 34
12,060 SF

CLEAR ZONE NOTE:

GATED ENTRANCE NOTES:

F  R S
-STRUCTURE	20 15 10
-POOL	20 5	5
-POOL DECK/PATIOS	15 5	5
-ACCESSORY STRUCTURES  20 5	5
-SHEDS	20 5	5
*  40' FOR LOTS 15-19
65' FOR LOTS 7-10 & 20-22

ZONING RS-3
ZONING A-1

TRACT LS5 25' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 36,492 SF (0.84 AC)

SET PRM

SET PRM

VILLAGE GREEN ZONING: RMH-8 LAND USE: MHRP

WALKER WOODS ZONING: RM-8 LAND USE: M-1

TYPICAL LOT LAYOUT

C-100
21-236

ROUTE SURVEY

REPORT OF SURVEY:
TYPE OF SURVEY: ROUTE SURVEY
THIS SURVEY PERFORMED BY:
MERIDIAN LAND SURVEYORS LB#6905 1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD. SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960
PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR & MAPPER IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE: BILLY M. MOODY PLS# 5336

THIS SURVEY MEETS ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA STANDARDS OF PRACTICE AS CONTAINED IN 5J-17, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE.

ELEVATIONS AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE MEASURED IN FEET AND DECIMAL PARTS THEREOF.
THE LAST DATE OF FIELD WORK WAS: 07/05/2022
BUILDING SETBACK LINES, IF SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION, BUT ARE NOT CERTIFIED TO. THE SETBACKS MUST BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION.

THE BEARING BASE FOR THIS SURVEY IS N00°17'28"E ALONG THE WEST SECTION LINE OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST. ALL OTHER BEARINGS ARE RELATIVE THERETO.

THE COORDINATES, IF SHOWN ON THIS MAP, REFER TO STATE PLANE COORDINATES, FLORIDA EAST ZONE, NAD 83 (2011 ADJUSTMENT).

DEED BEARINGS, IF SHOWN ON THIS MAP, ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY

THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CERTIFY TO THE EXISTENCE OR LOCATION OF ANY UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS: UTILITIES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ENCROACHMENTS, EXCEPT AS SHOWN.
NO INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD REGARDING EASEMENTS, RIGHT-OF-WAYS, OR OWNERSHIP WERE SUPPLIED TO THIS SURVEYOR, EXCEPT AS SHOWN.

UNLESS A COMPARISON IS SHOWN, DEED VALUES AND MEASURED VALUES ARE THE SAME.
UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, FOUND MONUMENTATION IS UNIDENTIFIED.
THE PARCEL OF LAND SHOWN HEREON APPEARS TO BE IN FLOOD ZONE "X", PER FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP #12061C0238 H, DATED DECEMBER 4, 2012.

ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO SURVEY MAPS OR REPORTS BY OTHER THAN THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES.

THE ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM (NAVD) OF 1988. PRIMARY BENCHMARK UTILIZED IS NGS MONUMENT "GPS 42", EL.=20.64'.
SITE BENCHMARK IS AS SHOWN

Legend & Abbreviations:
SYMBOLS NOT SCALEABLE FOR SIZE

VICINITY MAP

CABLE TV BOX CL - CENTERLINE
-- (CM) CONCRETE MONUMENT
CURB INLET
D - DRAINAGE MANHOLE
ELECTRIC BOX

PROJECT AREA

GATE VALVE
GUY WIRE
HYDRANT
IRON PIPE
IRON ROD & CAP
LIGHT POST
MITERED END SECTION
POINT OF INTERSECTION
S - SANITARY MANHOLE
STREET SIGN
SURFACE INLET
TELEPHONE SERVICE
TYPICAL ELEVATION
WATER METER
W - WELL

WOOD UTILITY POLE

Page 53

	

NORTH	74TH AVENUE ROUTE SURVEY FOR GHO HAWK'S GROVE	

PROJECT NO: DATE:
DRAWN BY:	

21-108

7/20/22

NJL							

											
											
		74TH AVENUE & 26TH STREET (WALKER AVENUE) VERO BEACH, FL	CHECKED BY:

SCALE:	BM

1" = 60'							

ROUTE SURVEY

REPORT OF SURVEY:
TYPE OF SURVEY: ROUTE SURVEY
THIS SURVEY PERFORMED BY:
MERIDIAN LAND SURVEYORS LB#6905 1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD. SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960
PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR & MAPPER IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE: BILLY M. MOODY PLS# 5336

THIS SURVEY MEETS ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA STANDARDS OF PRACTICE AS CONTAINED IN 5J-17, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE.

ELEVATIONS AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE MEASURED IN FEET AND DECIMAL PARTS THEREOF.

THE LAST DATE OF FIELD WORK WAS: 07/05/2022
BUILDING SETBACK LINES, IF SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION, BUT ARE NOT CERTIFIED TO. THE SETBACKS MUST BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION.

THE BEARING BASE FOR THIS SURVEY IS N00°17'28"E ALONG THE WEST SECTION LINE OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 32 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST. ALL OTHER BEARINGS ARE RELATIVE THERETO.

THE COORDINATES, IF SHOWN ON THIS MAP, REFER TO STATE PLANE COORDINATES, FLORIDA EAST ZONE, NAD 83 (2011 ADJUSTMENT).

DEED BEARINGS, IF SHOWN ON THIS MAP, ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY

THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CERTIFY TO THE EXISTENCE OR LOCATION OF ANY UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS: UTILITIES, FOUNDATIONS, OR ENCROACHMENTS, EXCEPT AS SHOWN.
NO INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD REGARDING EASEMENTS, RIGHT-OF-WAYS, OR OWNERSHIP WERE SUPPLIED TO THIS SURVEYOR, EXCEPT AS SHOWN.

UNLESS A COMPARISON IS SHOWN, DEED VALUES AND MEASURED VALUES ARE THE SAME.
UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, FOUND MONUMENTATION IS UNIDENTIFIED.
THE PARCEL OF LAND SHOWN HEREON APPEARS TO BE IN FLOOD ZONE "X", PER FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP #12061C0238 H, DATED DECEMBER 4, 2012.

ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO SURVEY MAPS OR REPORTS BY OTHER THAN THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES.

THE ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM (NAVD) OF 1988. PRIMARY BENCHMARK UTILIZED IS NGS MONUMENT "GPS 42", EL.=20.64'.
SITE BENCHMARK IS AS SHOWN

Legend & Abbreviations:
SYMBOLS NOT SCALEABLE FOR SIZE

BS

VICINITY MAP

PROJECT AREA

CABLE TV BOX CL - CENTERLINE
-- (CM) CONCRETE MONUMENT
CURB INLET
D - DRAINAGE MANHOLE
ELECTRIC BOX
GATE VALVE
GUY WIRE
HYDRANT
IRON PIPE
IRON ROD & CAP
LIGHT POST
MITERED END SECTION
POINT OF INTERSECTION
S - SANITARY MANHOLE
STREET SIGN
SURFACE INLET
TELEPHONE SERVICE
TYPICAL ELEVATION
WATER METER
W - WELL
WOOD UTILITY POLE

Page 54

NORTH

74TH AVENUE ROUTE SURVEY

PROJECT NO:	21-108

FOR GHO HAWK'S GROVE
74TH AVENUE & 26TH STREET (WALKER AVENUE)

DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:

7/20/22
NJL BM

VERO BEACH, FL

SCALE:	1" = 60'

Sebastian River Improvement District

Financial Report For December 2022

SEBASTIAN RIVER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT
DECEMBER 2022

REVENUES	
Annual Budget
10/1/22 9/30/23	

Actual Dec 22	Year To Date Actual
10/1/22 12/31/22	
1A9 Assessments	308,436	 2,162	1 ,511	
R-O-W 8se Fees	16,765	0	0	
Permlt Fees	5,000	0	1,25 	
Other Revenue	0	0	0	
,nterest ,ncome	 60	0	1,463	
Total Revenues	$	331,161	$	92,162	$	202,233	
				
EXPENDITURES				
/egal - *eneral	20,000	0	1,080	
/egal - Speclal Counsel	0	0	0	
/egal - %MAP ,ssues	0	0	0	
(xpert Consultant Fees	0	0	0	
'lstrlct Admlnlstratlve	30,000	2,500	7,500	
Operatlons Manager	21,000	1,750	5,250	
Operatlons Manager - Payroll Taxes	1,607	134	402	
(nglneerlng - *eneral	45,000	0	4,658	
(nglneerlng - Permlt	5,000	0	0	
(nglneerlng - Speclal ProMects	0	0	0	
(nglneerlng - Sand Mlnes	0	0	0	
(nglneerlng - /ateral ' Watershed	0	0	0	
(nglneerlng - 82nd Ave (xtenslon	0	0	555	
(nglneerlng - Other	42, 00	0	185	
Postage and 'ellvery	0	32	44	
Accountlng/Audlt	5,200	0	0	
,nsurance	20,000	0	 ,0 0	
Offlce Supplles	0	58	116	
Webslte Management	2,000	167	500	
'ues  Subscrlptlons	 25	0	265	
/egal Advertlsements	1,150	0	4 2	
Mlscellaneous	4,100	107	373	
Water Quallty Analytlcal Servlce	1,000	0	287	
R-O-W Malntenance	110,273	0	70,836	
C// Canal//ateral Malntenance	0	0	5,000	
Mlscellaneous Malntenance	2,500	0	0	
				
Total E[Senditures	$	312,6 	$	4,748	$	106,633	
				
Revenues Less E[Senditures	$	18, 06	$	87,414	$	9 ,600	
				
County Appralser Tax Collector Fee	 6,16 	0	 2,350 	
'lscounts For (arly Payments	 12,337 	 3,676 	 7, 77 	
				
E[cess/ Shortfall 	$	 	$	83,738	$	8 ,273	
				
Carryover From Prlor Year	0	0	0	
				
Net E[cess/ Shortfall 	$	 	$	83,738	$	8 ,273	

Bank Balance As Of 12/31/22	$	1,046,419.74	
Accounts Payable As Of 12/31/22	$	7,837.13	
Other Current Liabilities As Of 12/31/22	$	73,204.07	
Accounts Receivable As Of 12/31/22	$	33,262.62	
Available Funds As Of 12/31/22	$	998,641.16